- Title synonym to Sir Roger Penrose's new book, Cycles of Time.
I gave a thought to the new theory of the Big bang after Big Bang after Big Bang in a cyclic order. This was also pointed out by a series of photographs in Microwave wavelengths of our cosmos which showed some concentric microwave rings around galaxies.
The mentioning of these findings can be found in the below links.
So after reading this snippet, i would like to put forth my view on the same idea.
The Beginning:
From early on we humans try to find a beginning to every events in our life. So came up the theory of Big Bang which did a hard lined effort to propose an idea of universe being created by a single Big explosion called the Big Bang. And this event defined the very physical rules that defined the universe. Also we would like to make sure that God designed Big Bang in such a way as to form a universe to support life in its remote corners.
So from the new theory, we can make sure that there is no beginning and end to the conceivable universe, but may be our universe might end and regenerate to a new one. this possibility is more practical and looks much real than any other theories associated with the creation and destruction of our known universe.
From the events recorded during the big bang as we know, our universe was formed by Big Bang due to a creator whom we like to call God. there are people who mention which God, though that is irrelevant at this point.
Vatican also has some hold on the theories, which insists to have a creation theory embedded in all universe creation theories, without which the existence and creationism is not supported. Now I can imagine what happens when any of the physicists what to coin the theory of universe without creation. Its more complicated to imagine one but if the universe is going in cycles, then the easiest way to say is that there was no creation and there will be no destruction of the universe as a whole. The universe will just go on as a cyclic entity, forming and deforming many more dimensions of space, one of which we call our universe.
I am also thinking of the idea where there are multiple universes or parallel universes which were formed when our own universe was created. We lack to see them because we are trying to interpret the other universes based on the rules and laws of physics which might hold good for our universe. and this very notion makes other universes invisible to us.
Also, as galaxies fall into one another while going around in the universe, and create super massive black holes in their center, either by merging the black holes at the center of each galaxy, or by creating one in the event of the collision of these galaxies, I imagine the creation and destruction of each universe by the collision of parallel universes. In the even of each collision, the black holes at the center of each universe will creative a colossal black hole at the center of the new universe. The explosion of this energy, where the two black holes merge will actually accelerate the expansion of the known universe into a bigger and massive one. This expansion will just lead to a ever expanding universe as we know it and will never collapse into a pre-big bang entity as we thought.
Also the only way a universe can come to an end is when this colossal black hole gets consumed in its own density and disappears by the so called hawking evaporation. Now this holds very well to the present theory of the universe and this can also keep up to the fact that the entropy is maintained while creating and destroying the universe, the very idea might be averse to the religious groups, as this defies creationism.
This is just my theory to prove that there is no creation involved, but also would like to emphasize that God as we know is a timeless entity and we are incapable of defining the very God who is much complicated to define in the very existing language of our religion or science. or the very consciousness we have for now. The very fact of the matter brings to the conclusion that we should refrain defining God and start embracing the reality of God. Whether an atheist or an agnostic'ly oriented person, will have no knowledge in the present conscious abilities to prove or disprove the existence of God.
May be the fact to establish the true nature of God, is aeons in to the future, and probably we will attain that consciousness sooner, but it is very much the fact that there is no religious entity who can establish the existence of their God, without being questioning the existence of natural laws. Same is the case to disprove the fact that God does not exist.
Note: Lets refrain from defining the entity God and embrace his power of existence through non-existance in every universes in different forms.
No comments:
Post a Comment